Category: BVI
Category: BVI

In a recent decision of the Honourable Justice Chivers of the Commercial Division of the BVI Court, the Court considered a strike out application based on Hunter v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police [1982] AC 529, and separately Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100, abuse of process. Justice Chivers held that the substance of the Aldi Stores Ltd v WSP Group plc [2008] 1 WLR 748 principles apply in the BVI.

The Judge considered that whilst the Aldi requirements, whereby a party who intends to bring a subsequent action against existing parties or their privies must raise the issue with the court, may not have been promulgated in this jurisdiction, there can be no doubt that the obligation of a litigant to put their cards on the table (i.e. before the other party and the court) at an early stage and that this is a requirement of parties to litigation in the BVI. A party who fails to do so is “at high risk” of being held to have abused the court’s process and no lawyer in this jurisdiction, reading the CPR, Aldi, and Stuart v Goldberg Linde [2008] EWCA Civ 2 together could suppose otherwise.

The Defendants argued that the bringing of this claim fell afoul of both Hunter and Henderson abuse on the basis that the claims currently raised could and should have been raised in the previous proceedings brought in Hong Kong and the BVI and asserted, without opposition, that the Henderson principle applied regardless of whether the proceedings were in a different jurisdiction, notwithstanding that the previous proceedings did not result in a judgment on the merits, and even where the parties to the subsequent proceedings are not all the same as the parties to the previous proceedings.

The Claimants argued that there was no abuse on the basis that it was sensible for them to advance their claims one after the other, because this second claim turned upon the outcome of the first.

Chivers J was not convinced by this argument, and considering the conduct of the Claimants in withholding notice of their claim, granted the strike out.

For any more information please contact Ian Mann, Kimberly Crabbe-Adams, Lucy Hickmet or Jeremy Child.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Latest posts

Harneys Happenings

Anti-Suit Injunction against New York Proceedings overturned by Cayman Islands Court of Appeal

“Things gained through unjust fraud are never secure” (Sophocles)

Hong Kong Restructuring Week – 5 November 2018

The Restructuring Review: Harneys lawyers contribute to the Cayman Islands & British Virgin Islands Chapters

Tangerine Indemnity Litigation proves fruitful – The Cayman Islands Courts confirm meaningful protection for Fund Directors

Anti-plastic initiative: Reduce, Reuse, Refuse

No delays for civil fraud claims – The rule in Smith v Selwyn is no longer good law in Bermuda

Cayman Court determines complex civil aviation insurance dispute

Cayman Court considers grant of retrospective Beddoe relief in foreign proceedings

You’ve been served! (in accordance with the Hague Convention)

Something New under the Sun? The Cayman Islands Court illuminates aspects of Insolvency Law