Offshore Litigation

Blog

Offshore Litigation

Contributors

Jonathan Addo
Jonathan Addo
  • Jonathan Addo

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Ian Mann
Ian Mann
  • Ian Mann

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Nick Hoffman
Nick Hoffman
  • Nick Hoffman

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Vicky Lord
Vicky Lord
  • Vicky Lord

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Chai Ridgers
Chai Ridgers
  • Chai Ridgers

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
William Peake
William Peake
  • William Peake

  • Partner
  • London
Peter Ferrer
Peter Ferrer
  • Peter Ferrer

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
James Noble
James Noble
  • James Noble

  • Partner
  • Singapore
Jeremy Child
Jeremy Child
  • Jeremy Child

  • Partner
  • London
Claire Goldstein
Claire Goldstein
  • Claire Goldstein

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Jayson Wood
Jayson Wood
  • Jayson Wood

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Phillip Kite
Phillip Kite
  • Phillip Kite

  • Partner
  • London
Stuart Cullen
Stuart Cullen
  • Stuart Cullen

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Lorinda Peasland
Lorinda Peasland
  • Lorinda Peasland

  • Consultant
  • Hong Kong
Paul Madden
Paul Madden
  • Paul Madden

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Jessica Williams
Jessica Williams
  • Jessica Williams

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Paula Kay
Paula Kay
  • Paula Kay

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Andrew Thorp
Andrew Thorp
  • Andrew Thorp

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Henry Mander
Henry Mander
  • Henry Mander

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Andrew Johnstone
Andrew Johnstone
  • Andrew Johnstone

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Nicola Roberts
Nicola Roberts
  • Nicola Roberts

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Julie Engwirda
Julie Engwirda
  • Julie Engwirda

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Paul Smith
Paul Smith
  • Paul Smith

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands

Doing it for themselves – Cayman Islands Court confirms shareholders seeking a just and equitable winding-up petition do not have to do so for the benefit of all shareholders

In Tianrui (International) Holding Company Limited v China Shanshui Cement Group Limited the Cayman Islands Court of Appeal confirmed that a shareholder presenting a winding-up petition on the just and equitable ground did not have to have the purpose of advancing a class remedy on behalf of all shareholders.

At first instance, Justice Mangatal said “it is plain that this Petition was not presented with the purposes of advancing a class remedy on behalf of other shareholders”. Her Ladyship appeared to find Tianrui’s petition was an abuse of process because it was not advancing a class remedy for shareholders, based on the decisions in Ctrip Investment Holding Ltd v eHi Car Services Limited and Re Torchlight Fund LP:

  • In Ctrip, Justice Kawaley found that the shareholder was seeking to use its just and equitable winding-up petition to further its own commercial interests and not for a class remedy for the benefit of the shareholders generally. The petition was struck-out for being an abuse of process on a number of bases, including improper collateral purpose.
  • In Torchlight, when considering whether the petition was brought for an improper purpose Justice McMillan held “the Petitioners must demonstrate that the Petition has been pursued in the interests of the Limited Partners”.

The Court of Appeal disagreed with Justice Mangatal. It accepted that if a creditor’s petition is not invoking a class remedy the petition may be an abuse of process, but doubted the same principle would apply in respect of a contributory’s just and equitable winding-up petition. The latter will likely include complaints particular to that contributory, which may not be relevant to other contributories. The Court of Appeal found such a fact alone cannot be a reason for restraining a petition.

The Court held it was clear any such principle did not justify striking out Tianrui’s petition for two reasons. First, there was only one class of shares. Second, the idea that Tianrui could not petition in respect of acts of the company promoted by a majority of the other shareholders because Tianrui was not seeking a class remedy on behalf of those same shareholders (amongst others) was self-evidently wrong.

Doing it for themselves – Cayman Islands Court confirms shareholders seeking a just and equitable winding-up petition do not have to do so for the benefit of all shareholders

Leave A Comment